Amazing Spider-Man 2001 Annual
PLOT: Mary Jane is back and she and Peter attempt to put their lives back together. She is still spooked by things that remind her of her kidnapping and confinement The couple moves back in with Aunt May and during an intimate moment Peter,as Spider-Man, leaves to thwart a terrorist attack. Left alone Mary Jane ponders their life together and makes a decision about their future.
LIKES: Nice concept but not so nice execution. Sadly that’s about the best you can say of most of Mackie’s run. The idea of devoting an entire annual to the after affects of MJ’s deliverance from the kidnapper is a good idea. The two best things about this annual is that it tries to explore the relationship between Peter and Mary Jane and it is the end of Mackie’s time on this book. Oh, and at least we finally found out what was in that darn box.
DISLIKES: Mackie can’t quite pull it off. Whether or not you agree with MJ’s ultimate decision is irrelevant. The rub is how well the story is done and I just don’t buy it. Just before the emergency at the United Nations is brought to Peter’s attention MJ says, “I feel as though I am where I belong, I feel happy…safe.” By book’s end she’s saying she and Peter have changed so much they can’t go back to the way they were before. And Peter agrees saying he’s known the same thing for awhile?! And just how have they changed? Think back to the start of the Mackie/Byrne debacle. Peter was hiding the fact that he had returned to being Spidey from MJ and she was furious when she found out. Shortly thereafter she boarded the plane to a 16 issue absence. Seems they both forgot all about this. And why would Peter going off as Spidey so profoundly effect her that she would change from saying everything was perfect to feeling she had to leave? Did she forget she had to deal with Peter being Spider-Man? There are ample reasons for Mary Jane to feel she needs time by herself for awhile but they’re not presented here. And as for Joe Bennett’s artwork; I’ve enjoyed it in previous issues but he’s better suited to action issues. A little more subtlety is required in some of the faces and at times the bodies seem strangely contorted. Finally a note to editor Axel Alonso: Anna Watson appeared in Peter Parker: Spider-Man 29 so how could she be in Florida since November?
RATING: out of 4 web-heads and that’s because I’m feeling generous due to the official end of the Mackie era.
HB 56
View articlesYou might be interested in …

The Chi-Town Breakdown: ASM #92 LGY#893
So, I was laying on my couch the other day just thinking aloud “What would happen if someone merged The Lizard with Morbius?”. Yeah, no, I didn’t do that. WHY ON EARTH WOULD I THINK […]

Alford Notes: Amazing Spider-Man #49 – Blood Hunt Tie-In
by Mark Alford
If you ever sat around thinking, “Boy, it sure is a good thing that White Rabbit doesn’t have vampiric powers to use when trying to kill my favorite web-slinging hero,” then have I got bad […]

Near-Mint Amazing Fantasy #15 To Be Auction Off
by Mohammed
A 9.4 graded copy of the FIRST appearance of Spider-Man is to be auctioned of this month and is expected fetch in the amount of $400,000 or for those in the UK £276,422, if not […]
Social
Recent Comments
Brad Douglas on Spider-Tracer: Neal Adams: “Woah, I had no idea! Great article as usual. I don’t know why, but I assumed that art on the…” May 13, 21:14
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Zachary Joiner: Right, but wasn’t that a mind-controlled Kinglsey and Ned as Hobgoblins? Controlled by Queen Goblin? I was thinking…” May 10, 06:38
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Evan Berry: Thanks, this depiction of young Peter seems to fly in the face of everything we’ve ever seen of…” May 10, 06:37
Zachary Joiner on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23
Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drugs Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55