Amazing Spider-Man # 12
We don’t have any lame villains in this issue like we did last month. In fact we have six of my all time favorites. Unfortunately, almost all of them have a back story that is distracting to the reader. Starting off with the positives. I kind of like the new mystery with Mysterio. Is he dead, or is this a fake? It actually adds to the character in my opinion. But this could just be a mistake between the Marvel Knight office and the Spider-Office.
Second, I can’t stand Kraven in the Sinister Six. I know he’s not the real deal, but I have always hated this long lost son. It’s a cheap writers way out to use the villain and is a travesty to the “Kraven’s Last Stand” storyline. Howard Mackie didn’t invent this Kraven problem, but is adding to it by using this lame character.
The other travesty to past works was the use of Electro in that awful blue suit from his “Chapter One” days. This falls on John Byrne for ignoring 35 + years of continuity and suddenly deciding for Electro to put on that costume. Steve Ditko’s Electro costume is the best and only outfit Electro needs. Sheesh!
The only good thing about this Six reunion is the addition of Venom. It’s nice to see Venom as a baddie with a mad-on for Spidey.
So what did this issue deal with? Well we have a plot by the Sinister Six to kill Senator Ward who has formed a partnership with Doc Ock. Then a back story involves Mary Jane’s stalker getting bit closer. It sure is a shame to see Mackie either A) Write Mary Jane as a bitch or B) Make her a helpless superhero wife by making her cry all the time. Mackie chose to use letter “B” in here. “So Howard Mackie, is that your final answer??” Sorry I had a Regis moment. He needs to read the Spider-Man newspaper strip by Stan Lee to see how MJ needs to be written.
So overall I’m giving this book two out of four web heads. Clear up the barnacles that are on the old villians,fix the MJ situation and you might have an enjoyable comic.
So ends the first year of the re-boot. Here’s hoping year two has less peaks and valleys.
Brad Douglas
View articlesBrad created the Crawlspace back in 1998 while attending college at the University of Missouri-Columbia. He’s the webmaster and writes front page news items, and also produces, hosts and edits the podcast. He’s been collecting Spider-Man comics since the age of three and is a life-long fan of the webhead. His website has been featured in USA Today, Entertainment Weekly and on Marvel.com and inside the comics themselves. The Crawlspace is one of the first Spider-Man fan sites to ever hit the internet. Millions of people visit the site every year.
Brad has interviewed several “Spider-Celebrities” over the years including co-creator Stan Lee. He’s also interviewed actors who have portrayed Spider-Man like Paul Soles (Voice Actor from the 67 Spider-Man Cartoon), Dan Gilvezan (Spidey Voice Actor from Spider-Man & His Amazing Friends) ,Yuri Lownthal (Voice Actor from the Spider-Man PlayStation game) and Nicholas Hammond (Spider-Man 1977 Actor).
You might be interested in …
VENOM (2011) #9 REVIEW
Flash Thompson returns for yet another wacky Venom adventure! Read the review and leave a comment. VENOM #9 “Capital Punishment” WRITER: Rick Remender ARTIST: Stefano Caselli COLORIST: Frank Martin, Jr. LETTERING: VC’s Chris Eliopoulos COVER ARTIST: John Tyler Christopher
Amazing Spider-Man (Vol. 1) #547 Review
THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #547 TITLE: “Crimes of the Heart” WRITER: Dan Slott PENCILER: Steve McNiven INKER: Dexter Vines COLORIST: Morry Hollowell PLOT: The issue opens with a full-page splash of Peter sucking J. Jonah Jameson’s […]

MARCO SPEAKS SPIDEY- HEROES REBORN: YOUNG SQUADRON #1 REVIEW
When you need something new to do with a character or a team, then changing their superhero identity completely is always a wild, fresh, and innovative way to approach the story. In Young Squadron, we […]
Social
Recent Comments
Brad Douglas on Spider-Tracer: Neal Adams: “Woah, I had no idea! Great article as usual. I don’t know why, but I assumed that art on the…” May 13, 21:14
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Zachary Joiner: Right, but wasn’t that a mind-controlled Kinglsey and Ned as Hobgoblins? Controlled by Queen Goblin? I was thinking…” May 10, 06:38
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Evan Berry: Thanks, this depiction of young Peter seems to fly in the face of everything we’ve ever seen of…” May 10, 06:37
Zachary Joiner on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Hobgoblin and Spidey faught back towards the beginning of the wells run” May 9, 10:53
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Wouldn’t you know it? My comment posted twice, with the exception of my final sentence. Sorry about that!” May 9, 09:49
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:48
Evan Berry on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Hornacek – You are definitely not alone in your experience of the flashback’s interpretation of young Peter. Not only the…” May 9, 09:44
Hornacek on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “@Aqu: I have not read any Astonishing SM so I have no opinion here.” May 9, 06:23
Aqu@ on Craig’s Critique: Amazing Spider-Man #3 (Legacy #967): “Drug Are Bad, Mkay?” or “Up The Water Spout”: “Don’t know a thing about this new run and still has to finish the previous cycle, but as a lucky…” May 9, 05:52
Hornacek on Panel of the Day #1663 (Splash Page Sunday!): “@ac: Pretty sure this was during the first 10 (?) issues of the Mackie/Byrne reboot.” Apr 30, 09:55