by George Berryman » Mon May 16, 2011 6:53 pm
by FSUSpiderFan » Mon May 16, 2011 6:57 pm
by George Berryman » Mon May 16, 2011 7:03 pm
by Spider-Dad » Mon May 16, 2011 7:34 pm
by George Berryman » Mon May 16, 2011 7:45 pm
Spider-Dad wrote:However, I have to go with Clint on this one. The man with no name is quick...too quick for an aging veteran in Ethan Edwards.
by Thrawn » Tue May 17, 2011 11:40 am
Spider-Dad wrote:This one is TOUGH! Clint Eastwood against the Duke...wow...
However, I have to go with Clint on this one. The man with no name is quick...too quick for an aging veteran in Ethan Edwards. Plus the man with no name proves his aim is extremely accurate as his money making scheme is to free his partner from hanging by shooting the noose from a good distance. With the battle being in an urban setting, accuracy and quickness are the difference.
Great card gentlemen...great card.
Ethan Edwards is driven by hatred of the Comanche warband that killed his family in Texas and a thirst for vengeance. His search leads him into the blackest pits of a man's soul as he becomes increasingly distant from humanity. Eventually it's clear that if he finds his kidnapped niece and finds she's been turned into a member of the tribe... he'll kill her.
by Thrawn » Tue May 17, 2011 12:27 pm
by George Berryman » Tue May 17, 2011 1:19 pm
Thrawn wrote:Hm. Sounds an awful lot like the Man with No Name. Pure emotion and hate are still not enough to overcome skill and speed.
Thrawn wrote:His anger and hatred that's directed against the Comanche also will not be transferred to The Man with No Name. He's not Comanche.
by butters911 » Tue May 17, 2011 5:59 pm
by Spider-Dad » Tue May 17, 2011 8:01 pm
by George Berryman » Tue May 17, 2011 8:02 pm
Spider-Dad wrote:The problem with this card is...what are the weapons? Since they are not listed, we can only assume they will have pistols (picture with man with no name is a scene with a gun) and that is clearly the advantage of the man with no name. Fist fight? I go with Ethan. Unfortunately for Ethan, anger towards comanches will not do him much good in a gun fight.
by Spider-Dad » Tue May 17, 2011 8:32 pm
George Berryman wrote:Both combatants used pistols and rifles in their films and that is assumed here.
by George Berryman » Tue May 17, 2011 8:36 pm
Spider-Dad wrote:George Berryman wrote:Both combatants used pistols and rifles in their films and that is assumed here.
Thanks for the clarification George. Too bad for Ethan...
by Thrawn » Tue May 17, 2011 9:38 pm
George Berryman wrote:I could say a few things about greed here, too, since it's the only thing fueling your guy.
George Berryman wrote:Also - you make it sound like Ethan Edwards has just never fought anyone 'quick.' I suppose Comanches aren't quick then? Is this what you would have us believe, Thrawn?
by George Berryman » Wed May 18, 2011 1:05 pm
Thrawn wrote:Edwards is also not fighting Commanches in traditional gunfighter duels either. I'm just saying...you know, throwing that out there so you don't confuse potential voters without telling them the full story...not that you'd ever do that. I know I certainly wouldn't.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests