![]() |
Moderators: CrazyChris, BD, Spider-Girl, Kevin Cushing, Spideydude
by FSUSpiderFan » Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:26 pm


by RadioCity » Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:52 pm


by FSUSpiderFan » Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:36 pm
RadioCity wrote:- Amazing Spider-Man - no brainer. Great cast and an intent to make a great movie.
RadioCity wrote:- - The Avengers - epic scale never seen before in the genre. The more I read from Whedon the more I'm sold. A bit leery of the running time. Should be at least 150 min ++ for a film like this, but it's only 135 minutes.....


by AmFan15 » Sun Mar 18, 2012 7:15 pm

"Whether Aunt May dies or not isn't the question. If she dies, does it mean anything beyond a brief sales spike because collectors/speculators think they'll be able to make a profit selling the book later? That is the question. Back when, Stan and company won our hearts and minds. I cared about Spider-Man and the other Marvel characters as though they were friends. I cared every time Aunt May got sick. That's what good creative work does."
--Jim Shooter--



by RadioCity » Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:57 pm
FSUSpiderFan wrote:Sounds like enough time to me, at least they didn't try to cut it down to under 2 hours.


by NickMB » Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:19 am
RadioCity wrote:FSUSpiderFan wrote:Sounds like enough time to me, at least they didn't try to cut it down to under 2 hours.
I hope so. The scope of this thing is massive. Quite a juggling act. Will Whedon have enough time to give proper depth to these characters while trying to balance screen time? Look at something like Independence Day. That thing was like 150 minutes and the characters stll felt a bit hollow to me. Obviously alot of that comes down to writing and direction, but 135 minutes seems to be pushing it. We'll see.
by RadioCity » Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:43 am
NickMB wrote:Considering all the character intros have been done in other movies, 135 mins seems like plenty. If anything, it seems a bit long to me, you'd think they'd want a movie like this to be tight and lean rather than rambling. But we'll see.


by FSUSpiderFan » Mon Mar 19, 2012 11:26 am
RadioCity wrote:
So obviously more people have seen some of these films more then others and I have no doubt that the Avengers will leave IM2 is the dust. Relasing these individual franchises goes hand in hand with expanding the fan base leading up to the Avengers. I don't think you can assume people will know all of them. I'm certainly not saying it can't be done in 135 minutes or that the film won't be good. But if you are going for more then just an Independence Day-type spectacle and really want the audience (beyond the hardcore fanbase) to invest in these characters, then 135 minutes makes Whedon's job harder IMO.


by NickMB » Mon Mar 19, 2012 3:40 pm
by Aziz » Tue Mar 20, 2012 12:32 pm
Not looking forward to the new Batman movie?gregxb wrote:The Hobbit!


by Wheatcakes » Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:26 am


by FSUSpiderFan » Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:43 am
Wheatcakes wrote:The GI Joe 2 trailer got me a little jazzed. It was short and didn't show much, but sometimes less is more.


by Tabularasa » Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:15 pm


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
