BIG SPOILERS for surprise ending...
![]() |
Moderators: CrazyChris, BD, Spider-Girl, Kevin Cushing, Spideydude
by Hobo-Goblin » Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:44 am

by stillanerd » Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:24 pm




by Donomark » Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:52 pm


by Thrawn » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:26 am





by Hobo-Goblin » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:38 am
Thrawn wrote:I posted this on the front page and I'll post it here - killing Daniel Kingsley was a mistake and was done very badly.
Daniel Kingsley is as much a part of the Hobgoblin Legacy as Harry is to the Green Goblin's. Spider-Girl showed beyond perfectly how both Roderick and Daniel should be utilized in the modern day Marvel Universe. Daniel has value as a character is it was awful storytelling to just kill him off in such a poor manner like that.
OMD/BND and Dan Slott fail again in my opinion.

by Enigma_2099 » Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:59 pm


by Thrawn » Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:49 am
Hobo-Goblin wrote:Wha? Daniel was essential to Roderick's plans, but he was never anything more than a pawn.
Hobo-Goblin wrote:He's certainly not on the same level as Harry Osborn, for that matter.
Daniel Kingsley is as much a part of the Hobgoblin Legacy as Harry is to the Green Goblin's.
If Daniel had to be sacrificed to get the REAL Hobgoblin back, then I'd say that's a worthy trade.
Hobo-Goblin wrote:After all, everyone KNOWS now what Kingsley's game is and how he used his brother. How much more useful could Daniel have been?





by Hobo-Goblin » Sat Aug 18, 2012 10:43 am

by NickMB » Sat Aug 18, 2012 12:20 pm
Hobo-Goblin wrote:And tweaking the fans seems to be Marvel's M.O. nowadays.
by Thrawn » Sat Aug 18, 2012 2:28 pm
Hobo-Goblin wrote:Okay, I'll grant you that Daniel might be intrinsically important to Roderick's Hobgoblin, but I'd say Macendale, even being the loser and failure he was, was more influential to the Hobgoblin's legacy than Daniel was (negatively, or otherwise).
Hobo-Goblin wrote:I think Slott was going for the more "surprising" route with his plan here.
Hobo-Goblin wrote: If he wanted to make Phil the Hobgoblin and not kill Daniel, he could have just had Roderick use Phil as yet another dupe.
Hobo-Goblin wrote: While that is Roderick's M.O., from a story perspective it's a bit overdone now.





by Hobo-Goblin » Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:37 pm
NickMB wrote:Hobo-Goblin wrote:And tweaking the fans seems to be Marvel's M.O. nowadays.
"Nowadays"? The entire original Hobgoblin saga was one big session of tweaking the fans over who he was. "He's Flash Thompson!" "No, he's Ned Leeds!" [WAIT TWENTY YEARS] "No, he's Roderick Kingsley!" Doing plot twists and fake-outs has been with Marvel for decades. People just seem to be taking it as a personal insult for some reason "nowadays".

by FSUSpiderFan » Sat Aug 18, 2012 7:29 pm
Hobo-Goblin wrote:If Daniel had to be sacrificed to get the REAL Hobgoblin back, then I'd say that's a worthy trade.


by NickMB » Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:36 am
Hobo-Goblin wrote:NickMB wrote:Hobo-Goblin wrote:And tweaking the fans seems to be Marvel's M.O. nowadays.
"Nowadays"? The entire original Hobgoblin saga was one big session of tweaking the fans over who he was. "He's Flash Thompson!" "No, he's Ned Leeds!" [WAIT TWENTY YEARS] "No, he's Roderick Kingsley!" Doing plot twists and fake-outs has been with Marvel for decades. People just seem to be taking it as a personal insult for some reason "nowadays".
The way I read it, that was mostly to keep sales up and also because every new writer had a new plan for the Hobgoblin's secret ID.
And there's no two ways about it; today's Marvel is a lot more blatant in regards to "we did this to purposely annoy the fans". SInce the advent of the internet, one gets the feeling that is actually the PLAN in regards to most things.
by Mr. Noodle » Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:12 pm


by dornwolf » Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:25 pm
Mr. Noodle wrote:I don't think they make any distinction between making fans angry and making them excited. I think they think it's the same thing; and they seem to find it easier to make fans angry.


