by Thrawn » Fri Dec 17, 2010 3:20 pm
by George Berryman » Fri Dec 17, 2010 4:59 pm
Thrawn wrote:Have you given any thought to creating a Fight Club Trading Card archive George? I'll be honest one of my favorite parts of Fight Club is appreciating the work you put into the trading cards. Sometimes when picking my combatant I think to myself "Who would I like to see George make a trading card for"? The Crawlspace has an image gallery right? Any chance Brad would let you make a section for the Fight Cards that we could link to?
by Thrawn » Sat Dec 18, 2010 7:42 am
George Berryman wrote:I haven't looked into that since all the cards are still posted in their original fights, and that Master List has links to 'em.
George Berryman wrote:Plus, some of 'em I am not happy with and will redo when that character heads into another fight.
by George Berryman » Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:21 pm
Thrawn wrote:Some of those links are incorrectly linked. I personally think it would be nice to collect them all in an image gallery, but that's me.
by George Berryman » Sun Dec 19, 2010 1:51 am
by Thrawn » Sun Dec 19, 2010 8:08 am
by Thrawn » Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:19 pm
by George Berryman » Wed Dec 22, 2010 5:57 pm
Thrawn wrote:Hey George, you accidentally listed Captain Cold twice.
by Venomaniac » Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:08 pm
by George Berryman » Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:03 pm
by Venomaniac » Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:36 pm
George Berryman wrote:Fight Club's always been like this and it's always worked. At the end of the day the vote count is and will forever be the final arbiter of win, lose or draw. I barely have enough time to do Fight Club as it is. I darn sure don't have the time to go through threads that can sometimes go three or more pages to take a second count on who is saying what.
This seems to me like fixing what isn't broken.
by CrazyChris » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:00 pm
by BertoneBeatle » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:26 pm
by CrazyChris » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:30 pm
by BertoneBeatle » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:39 pm
CrazyChris wrote:I'd like to illustrate my point with two real life examples.
First example: In a recent fight Berserk suggested that perhaps he lost because Bertone was able to call in more favors than him. If Berserk's statement is right, then my proposed rule would solve improve fight clubs by making it so that "calling in favors" doesn't undermine the purity of the fights. If Bertone is right that his victory had more to do with the strength of his arguments, then my proposed rule would improve fight club by taking away "the other guy called in favors" as an excuse for losing. Under my proposed rule, there would simply be less reason for anyone to doubt that the winner won for the right reasons, which would increase our fun by improving our confidence in the validity of the results.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests