![]() |
Moderators: Spider-Girl, Kevin Cushing
by insaneJonny » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:50 pm

by Kevin Cushing » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:54 pm
insaneJonny wrote:Oh and keeping with everyones guesses for the faceless man, my first guess was gaunt, however when i get home tomorrow i'm making a list of every possible suspect from my dk ultimate spider-man guide




by Shadow116 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:31 pm




by stillanerd » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:38 pm
Kevin Cushing wrote:
I've addressed this before, but I made a decision not to wrap up or even acknowledge the many BND subplots, because those are their stories and I have no knowledge of how they're going to end. This book, to me, would be pointless if we were working on the same concepts. And mine would probably end up inferior since they have the map of how all the pieces fit and how all the mysteries work out, and I'd be flailing in the dark trying to piece together their clues in a coherant way. So yes, this was a cheat, but it was the only way to logistically pull this project off well I think.
Aunt May had the perfect death once already, so I didn't want to even attempt to rival it. I just let her death be a shock, and tried to show respect to her legacy with the funeral. But yes, her death was mostly a piece of board clearing.
I see where you're coming from, involving Spidey would have been the more traditional way to do it. But I like the idea that Spider-Man just hears that someone's brutally killed Norman Osborn. Because Norman has such a status in his mind as the top of the evil tower, there's a sort of apprehension over who might have done that. And it was important for the development of Harry in this story for him to kill his father very deliberately. Whether it's a direction you like or not, it's a big turning point for him to tell his father that he's a disapointment, and then kill him easily.
Not intentional but...ironic. Honestly, though, I always knew he'd bare a resemblance to Red Skull, but he's not going to look like that very much longer so it's not a big deal.




by CrazyChris » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
I've addressed this before, but I made a decision not to wrap up or even acknowledge the many BND subplots, because those are their stories and I have no knowledge of how they're going to end. This book, to me, would be pointless if we were working on the same concepts. And mine would probably end up inferior since they have the map of how all the pieces fit and how all the mysteries work out, and I'd be flailing in the dark trying to piece together their clues in a coherant way. So yes, this was a cheat, but it was the only way to logistically pull this project off well I think.


by Kevin Cushing » Thu Nov 20, 2008 11:37 pm
stillanerd wrote:Fair enough. It's just you did use characters such as Vin Gonzales (as villain I grant you, which is not what he's become so far in the actual books) and Carlie Cooper (dating a Flash Thompson that's not in a wheelchair no less), after all. And if Carlie Cooper turns out to be Menace in the actual comics (as I think she could very well be since I consider Lily to be another red herring like Harry) then it really separates your work from theirs. Not to say that isn't a bad thing.
Then again, technically that happened in "The Night Gwen Stacy Died" already and that was the best send off for Norman Osborn anyway
You mean to tell me the Faceless Man is actually the Nicolas Cage/John Travolta character "Castor Troy" from Face/Off!![]()
Hmm, so has he or she been a character we seen before?
CrazyChris wrote:...so you won't be using Alana Jobson? Dropped.




by Hambone » Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:43 am
Kevin Cushing wrote:I'm trying to imagine how an artist can decipher "As Peter is sitting, a napkin that Flash has just thrown hits him in the chest. They are all laughing." in one panel.
I can see it perfectly in my head, so would one of our artists like to draw this panel to show Mets?



by Hambone » Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:14 am
![spiderman [smilie=spiderman.gif]](./images/smilies/spiderman.gif)



by cpahl2000 » Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:11 pm
bdog wrote:Kev, this is probably my favorite issue yet! You really out did yourself, good job.



by Lockdown » Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:21 pm
by FSUSpiderFan » Sat Nov 22, 2008 6:30 pm


by BD » Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:09 pm
by LynnDavid » Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:06 pm

by Kevin Cushing » Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:48 pm
FSUSpiderFan wrote:The Faceless man seems appropriately brutal, although I’m not sure I like the name…maybe something a bit more subtle…
Sounds like Peter got one of his superbuddies to go after May’s killer. Sounds like Logan or Punisher. I understand why you are not having him do it himself since it would retread on Back in Black and interfere with his honeymoon but somehow I feel Peter wouldn’t abdicate that responsibility and give it to someone else…
Isn’t it a little strange having Peter and MJ go on a double date with an ex on their honeymoon?
Norman passing the company to Peter feels like something he would do. It plays off of some of the comics where he was grooming him as a successor. It does have an Angel season five feel to it. Peter is going to take over Wolfram and Oscorp…
Where is Menken from I don’t remember him?
Hey look, you were able to write a great comic story in 22 pages, it’s amazing!
BD wrote:Kev,
You're tied for my favorite Spider-book for the month. AMZ 574 and CS #3 are at the top of my list.
Love the PP/MJ and Flash/ Lilly double date. I dont' think you took too long with the out of mask stuff. Half the attraction of Spider-Man is his soap-opera-ness.
Also loved Lilly talking to MJ in the bathroom. I'm a sucker for puns, and I loved the "but" part. I laughed out loud.
The Killshot death scene was also very cool. And I can so see the last words kill shot hears is "kill shot."
The black Spider is interesting. I fear it's too close to Venom though, but character development will make the two different entities.
Loved the Deodato reference. I always get a kick out of those things. Its just a nod to the fans. I mean why have Joe Blow the attorney when you can make someone smile with them being a "Bendis" a "Romita" etc. The Daredevil movie did it and I loved it.
I wasn't a fan of Peter saying "he's scared." I know, Peter is the everyman, but he's also our hero. I'm not sure I've ever heard Peter say those words. I could be wrong. If MJ's life is in danger I could see it, or if Aunt May is clinging to her last breath...I could see him saying, "I"m scared." But going to a board meeting, nah.
Also if Matt Murdock doesn't know who Peter is, and Peter knows who Matt is....then why would he whisper to MJ about his secret when he knows DD's ears are sooo good. It's nit picky, but it bothered me when I read it.
Lack of Peter in the suit. I don't want a dumb mugger in the story to see the suit, but I want more Spidey. It might be different if I had the artwork. For instance, I see you working in the suits in the script. Like the Goblin appearing in the board room etc.
Rating: 4.5 webheads out of 5. Awesome job and I'm proud to have my sites name attached to it.![]()
![]()
LynnDavid wrote:Hi, This is my first time posting.
A few minutes ago, I wrote a fairly detailed critique of the first three issues (I just found out about them and read all three at once), and I'm not sure what happened, but all of a sudden I was being asked to log in and my comments were gone.
I expect an issue of Spider-Man to have several pages of action with at least one costumed fight scene, probably two, advancement of sub-plots, and advancement of the plots of the Peter Parker identity with his supporting cast. I think these issues have been heavy on the latter two elements, but too light on the first. I'd like to see more scenes of a villain actually fighting Spider-Man each issue.
I wonder if frustration with the lack of development of sub-plots in the official Marvel book has caused you to overcompensate with your efforts. You seem to have ten times the number of ideas of the "braintrust," and I commend you for that. I'd like to see each idea savored just a little bit more.
I hope, for example, you go back and show the confrontation between Harry and Norman. I think this could have very effectively been done in chronological order, without sacrificing the drama of Harry talking to Norman's severed head.
Good luck with future issues!
Lynn David




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
